Mudjacking Or Polyurethane Foam Raising: Which is best?

Mudjacking Or Polyurethane Foam Raising: Which is best?

Concrete is the 2nd most-used substance on Earth and is only outnumbered by water.

While durable, it’s not always in top condition for long. The aging concrete is vulnerable to all kinds of damage and can be unattractive and a safety problem.

The process of mudjacking and polyurethane injections comprise two commonly used concrete repair techniques. They serve the same purpose of leveling and repairing old and damaged concrete.

While they are similar, it’s crucial to understand the differences that set these two approaches to determine the best option for your project.


Mudjacking may also be known by the names of concrete sniveling pressure grouting or slab grouting.

Sand cement, sand, and other materials mix to form an encapsulated mixture referred to as a”slurry. The slurry is pumped through holes drilled into concrete to increase and level it.

Mudjacking is ideal for concrete that is in good shape but not even. It is suitable for driveways, slabs and decks, walkways, porches, steps, and much more.

There are certain projects for which Mudjacking isn’t the right choice. It’s not a good option on large or load-bearing slabs since it’s not strong enough to lift them up without damaging them. It could also create more problems for badly damaged concrete since it isn’t able to cover every hole and can cause the concrete to sink with time.

Additionally, if the soil beneath the concrete cannot hold additional weight, Mudjacking material weighs approximately 100 pounds in cubic feet, the concrete slab could sink further over time.

Finally, the mortar and sand used for the mud jacking process is not waterproof and will easily degrade over time when water drains through the sides and beneath the slab. Therefore, this procedure in a zone that will be exposed to lots of water isn’t ideal.

It is possible to learn more about this issue by looking at other issues related to Mudjacking.

Polyurethane Foam Raising

Polyurethane concrete lift, a.k.a. PolyLift or Polyjacking, uses a geotechnical expander with high-density foam to lift and stabilize concrete slabs. The material and the equipment are like the ones employed in spray foam insulation; however, the foam used for lifting concrete is more durable.

The initial step of a polyurethane injection repair is to drill tiny holes. High-density polyurethane foam is the spray through the holes. It will begin filling the holes beneath the concrete.

The foam can expand 7 feet in each inject hole. It lifts the concrete’s levels, stabilizes the concrete, and fills any gaps between concrete and the earth.

Polyurethane concrete raising is ideal for large, heavy or delicate concrete slabs. It’s also great for concrete that requires returning the service as quickly as roads because of its speedy drying time.

The advantage of using polyurethane instead of “mud,” Qcement, or sand is that it does not degrade over time. This makes repair an extremely long-lasting solution.

For more details, look up all the steps involved in the polyurethane procedure.

PolyLifting vs. Mudjacking

The advantages and disadvantages of each concrete repair procedure are the best methods to determine which one is the best choice for you.

Mudjacking can offer some positives in comparison to increasing polyurethane concrete. It’s less expensive and simpler to control.

However, at a similar time, the mudjacking process uses more materials and requires more cleaning. There are more holes sufficient for weeds to develop through them. It is also possible for water to get inside and cause shifting slabs and more destruction and settling.

Foam injections are cured within 15 minutes, compared to a full day’s worth of Mudjacking. It’s less intrusive since it requires fewer drilling holes. It’s more durable, doesn’t hold moisture or pollute the surrounding,s and can be used in areas that aren’t accessible to equipment for mudjacking.

Despite these benefits, however, you might wonder how long foam the jacking process lasts? While mudjacking is typically used for 2-5 decades, polyurethane can last much longer if maintained properly.

Find out more about polyurethane and. Mudjacking repair.

The reason Polyurethane Injections are a better value

Mudjacking is the most traditional and less costly method for concrete repair. A lower price at the beginning doesn’t necessarily mean more value.

A polyurethane injection lasts for longer than a mudjacking repair. This means that you won’t need to replace the concrete repeatedly and will save you cash over time.

To meet these and other requirements, there are many reasons to think about a polyurethane injection instead of mudjacking. It will give you a better return on your investment and an extended-lasting, more attractive repair. It’s also a flexible option that will repair concrete everywhere in your home.

The Reasons to Choose the Polyurethane Injection

Some experts may suggest mudjacking as it’s more affordable and less complicated. However, it’s not always the ideal choice due to several factors. The disadvantages of the polyurethane injection don’t appear to be as bad when considering its benefits.

Polyurethane injections cost more than mudjacking; however, they are more durable. This can result in savings over time since it doesn’t have to be replaced frequently.

Additionally, you get faster, more efficient work for the price when you select polyurethane concrete elevating. The project can be completed in a short time due to advantages like less drilling holes and shorter drying time.

Polyurethane injections are also employed on a wider variety of projects.

The foam has enough strength to lift massive slabs. It is easier to control and will not cause damage to fragile concrete. Polyurethane concrete raising equipment can be more compact than larger mudjacking equipment.

Where can you get a Polyurethane Injection?

There are a variety of methods to fix concrete. The most common approach is to replace each slab. However, this can be a lengthy, costly procedure. This is why there are better options for the modern homeowner.

Mudjacking is less expensive and quicker than replacing the entire system but has a few disadvantages, such as a long drying time and the possibility of more damage.

Polyurethane concrete raising can result in the longest-lasting and fastest repair. It is also able to penetrate more areas than the mudjacking method. It’s more price for the money and is the ideal option for nearly every project.

Repairing concrete can be an easy DIY job; however, using a professional will give you the most effective, lasting outcomes. We’ll employ a polyurethane injections to maintain your house’s concrete in the top state.

Explore our extensive services, and contact us for more details. Concrete Hero services most of the suburbs in the northwest, including Arlington Heights concrete repair, and the suburbs to the west, such as Naperville concrete raising services.